Situational Judgement Test Practice
Workplace scenarios rated against the behaviours an employer has decided predict success. No maths, and barely a clock.
Situational Judgement Practice Tests
Situational Judgement Test
Read workplace scenarios and rate how effective each response option would be. Scored against an expert key across competency dimensions. Mirrors the SHL SJT format.
Cubiks Situational Judgement
Read workplace scenarios and rate how effective each response would be against an expert competency key. Mirrors the Cubiks situational judgement format.
Strengths-Based Situational Judgement
Read realistic workplace scenarios and rate how effective each response would be. Scored against an expert strengths key - and how quickly and confidently you answer contributes to your result. Mirrors the core Cappfinity strengths-based SJT used by EY, Teach First and other graduate schemes.
What Situational Judgement Measures
Fit with the competency framework
Employers build the scoring key from their own competencies, so the same answer can score differently at two companies. A collaborative culture rewards consulting the team; a fast-moving one rewards deciding and informing.
Prioritisation
Many scenarios present four things that all look urgent. What is measured is the order you tackle them in, and in particular whether you protect the commitment that affects other people.
Consistency
The same underlying judgement is usually tested more than once in different wording. Answers that swing between scenarios flag as inconsistent even when each one looks reasonable alone.
Question Formats
Rate each response
Score four or five possible actions individually, typically from counterproductive to highly effective. Used by SHL. You can rate more than one response as effective, which is what makes it more forgiving than ranking.
Rank the responses
Order every option from best to worst. Harder to score well on, because partial credit depends on the whole order rather than on picking one right answer.
Most and least effective
Choose only the best and the worst action from the list. Common in Cubiks situational judgement, and the middle options are deliberately hard to separate.
Most and least like me
The strengths-based variant used by Cappfinity, and by EY, KPMG and Teach First among others. It measures preference and energy rather than judgement, so second-guessing the key works badly here.
Video and immersive scenarios
A filmed or interactive scenario in place of written text, increasingly used at the assessment centre stage. The judgement being tested is the same; only the presentation changes.
How to Prepare
Read the employer values page first
The scoring key is usually derived from the published competency framework. Ten minutes on the careers site tells you whether they reward decisiveness or consultation, and that resolves most borderline options.
Escalate rarely, and never first
Do the part you can do within your own authority, then escalate what genuinely sits above it. Going straight to a manager scores low on almost every key, and so does never escalating anything.
Never pick the option that avoids the problem
Ignoring an issue, going over a colleague head without speaking to them, or waiting to see whether it resolves itself are the reliably worst-rated actions across every provider.
Answer as the role, not as yourself
A graduate analyst and a team leader should answer some scenarios differently. Anchor to the level you have applied for and the authority it actually carries.
Do not overthink the strengths-based versions
Most and least like me formats check consistency across the whole test. Choosing what you think they want produces a contradictory profile far more often than it produces a strong one.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can you fail a situational judgement test?
Yes. SJTs are frequently used as a sift, not just as extra information, and a low fit score can end an application on its own. They tend to be scored against a threshold set by the employer rather than curved against other candidates.
Is there a right answer in an SJT?
There is a scoring key, which is not quite the same thing. The key is built from what the employer competency framework rewards, often validated against how existing high performers answered. So there are better and worse answers, but they belong to that employer rather than being universally correct.
How is a situational judgement test scored?
On rating formats you earn credit for how close your rating is to the key, so being one point out still scores something. On ranking formats credit depends on the whole order. On strengths-based formats you are profiled rather than marked, and consistency across the test matters more than any single answer.
Should I answer honestly or strategically?
Answer as the best version of yourself in that role. Pure honesty ignores the fact that the test measures fit against a defined framework. Pure strategy produces inconsistency, which is detected. Read the values, then answer as somebody who genuinely holds them.
How long does a situational judgement test take?
Typically 20 to 40 minutes for 8 to 20 scenarios. Many are untimed or generously timed, because the employer wants considered answers rather than fast ones. Video-based versions take longer, usually 30 to 45 minutes.
Provider guides
Ready to start practising?
Real time limits, full scoring and percentile feedback on every test.