Skip to main content
All employer guides
Employer guide

Colgate-Palmolive Pymetrics Practice

Colgate-Palmolive is named in one reputable report as an employer whose applicants might be asked to play the pymetrics games. This page gives you that citation in full, its limits, and a clear description of what the games measure.

One source
Strength of Evidence
Reported, not confirmed
2021
Date of Report
Before the Harver merger
Trait profile
What You Get
No score, no pass mark

What the Evidence Actually Is

The honest starting point is that most of what you will read connecting Colgate-Palmolive to pymetrics is uncited. One source of real quality names it, and here is the sentence.

MIT Technology Review, in a February 2021 article about auditing AI hiring algorithms, wrote: “If you apply to McDonald’s, Boston Consulting Group, Kraft Heinz, or Colgate-Palmolive, you might be asked to play Pymetrics’s games.”

A named publication with editorial accountability is a genuinely better source than a prep page. It is still not Colgate-Palmolive’s own careers page and not a vendor case study, and the wording hedges deliberately: might be asked. So does this page.

What five years does to a claim like this
The report predates pymetrics’ 2022 acquisition by Harver. Assessment contracts in consumer goods turn over regularly, and a company may use a vendor for one graduate pipeline and not another. Treat this as a well-sourced possibility rather than a description of your process, and let your invitation settle it.

What the Pymetrics Games Measure

The games are unlike a conventional aptitude test in a way that catches most people out. There is no reading comprehension, no numerical section and no score. You play roughly a dozen short games, most two or three minutes long, and the platform records how you behave under each one.

Those behaviors become a profile across traits including attention, working memory, risk appetite, fairness, learning from feedback, planning and emotional interpretation. The profile is then matched against a model built from people already performing well in the role you applied for. This is the reason there is no single right way to play: a profile that suits a supply chain role may not suit a sales one at the same company.

The kinds of task involved

  • Go and no-go tasks, pressing or holding back as shapes appear, measuring impulse control and sustained attention.
  • Memory tasks, repeating digit sequences that lengthen until you slip.
  • Risk tasks, pumping balloons for money and choosing when to bank. Neither boldness nor caution is inherently the correct setting.
  • Exchange tasks, deciding how much to entrust to another player and how to reciprocate, measuring trust and fairness.
  • Planning tasks, working out a whole sequence of moves before the first one.
  • Emotion tasks, reading feeling from faces or short written scenarios.

How to Prepare Honestly

There is a narrow, real benefit to practice and a wide, false one. The real benefit is format familiarity: knowing what a game wants means you start playing immediately instead of losing 30 seconds of a 150-second game to the instructions, and you play without the low-grade panic of the unfamiliar.

The false benefit is the idea that you can decide in advance which traits to display. You cannot see the model, the target varies by role, and deliberately distorting your play is as likely to move you away from a match as toward one. It can also win you a job that does not suit you, which is the worst outcome available.

Practice

Free to play

Also in the battery

The full set is on the pymetrics practice hub.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Colgate-Palmolive definitely use pymetrics?

No. One reputable publication reported in 2021 that applicants “might be asked” to play the games. Neither Colgate-Palmolive nor the vendor confirms it on any page we could open.

Is there a pass mark?

No. The games produce a trait profile rather than a score, and that profile is matched against a role model you never see. A rejection is a fit judgement rather than a verdict on ability.

Should I play cautiously?

Not as a strategy. Risk appetite is one of the traits being measured, and artificially low risk-taking is as much a distortion as artificially high. Play the way you would actually play.

What if my invitation says Harver?

Harver acquired pymetrics in 2022 and now sells the games. A Harver-branded game assessment is very likely the same battery described here.

Are your games the real pymetrics assessment?

No. These are independent practice exercises built to match each game’s published format. They contain no real test content and are not supplied, reviewed or endorsed by Colgate-Palmolive, pymetrics or Harver.

CogniPrep is an independent practice platform. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by or connected to Colgate-Palmolive, pymetrics or Harver. Colgate-Palmolive is a trademark of its respective owner and is used here for identification and descriptive purposes only. The association described here rests on a single sentence in an MIT Technology Review article published on 11 February 2021, which itself says applicants “might be asked” to play the games. It is not confirmed by Colgate-Palmolive or by the vendor, and hiring practices change, so confirm what your own process involves with whoever invited you.

Try the Pymetrics Games Free

Three games are free to play here. Seeing the formats once means you spend your real assessment playing rather than decoding instructions

Start Practising Free