Skip to main content
CogniPrep logo
Every assessment answered
Cubiks / Talogy

Can You Cheat Cubiks and Logiks Tests?

Cubiks pairs a very fast reasoning test with a personality inventory that removes the flattering answer on purpose.

Short answer: no.

Logiks moves too fast to look anything up, and PAPI forces a choice between statements that are equally desirable, so there is no good answer to pick.

Logiks
The reasoning half
Verbal, numerical and abstract sections, each only a few minutes long.
Questions rotate between forms, so no fixed paper exists to leak.
Too fast for a lookup: the section ends before you have found the item.
Defeated by speed, not by security.
PAPI
The personality half
No correct answers, and no scale where higher is simply better.
The ipsative form makes you choose between two equally appealing statements.
Returns to the same traits from several directions, so a constructed profile stops agreeing with itself.
Defeated by design, not by speed.

Two halves, and each defeats a shortcut differently

A Cubiks invitation usually covers two very different things, and it is worth knowing which one you are being asked about. Logiks is a reasoning test with correct answers. PAPI is a personality inventory with none. Candidates who look for a way around Cubiks tend to have one of them in mind and then find the advice does not apply to the other.

Logiks is over before a shortcut can start

The Logiks sections are short. A few minutes each, with enough questions in them that finishing is unusual. That format is not built as an anti-cheating measure, it is built to measure speed of reasoning, but it has the same effect. There is no slack to spend.

Consider the mechanics of a lookup on a four minute section. Read the question, decide you want help, switch windows, search for matching wording, find the item, read the answer, switch back. Twenty five seconds if nothing goes wrong. On a section that short you have just spent a tenth of your entire time budget to answer a single question, and the answer is probably from a different form anyway.

PAPI removes the flattering answer on purpose

The ipsative version of PAPI is the interesting one. Instead of asking you to rate a statement, it puts two statements side by side and asks which describes you better. Both are usually things a candidate would be happy to be. I finish what I start, against I get on well with people I have just met. There is no bad option, so there is nothing to fake toward.

What that produces is a profile of relative preference rather than absolute level. You cannot be high on everything, because every choice is a trade. A candidate trying to construct an ideal employee finds there is no such thing to construct: picking one strength always means declining another.

Why it works
Both options are desirable
When neither statement is the obviously better one to endorse, the socially desirable answer disappears and what is left is genuine preference.
Why it works
Traits reappear in new words
The same underlying tendency comes back several times, phrased differently. An assembled answer set stops agreeing with itself, and that inconsistency is visible.
Why it works
The interview uses the report
PAPI is frequently used to shape follow-up questions. A profile you invented becomes a script you then have to keep performing, live.
Why it works
There is no top score
Profiles are read against role demands. A trait that helps in one job is a caution in another, so there is no direction that is simply better.

What to do instead

Do
Do short, full-speed Logiks runs. The pacing on a four minute section has to be automatic, not deliberate.
Answer every Logiks question you can reach, and move on fast when one is not coming.
Answer PAPI quickly and honestly. First instinct is closer to the trait than a considered construction.
Read the situational judgement test as a description of how you would actually handle the situation, not what you think is expected.
Check which Cubiks products your invitation names, since Logiks and PAPI need completely different preparation.
Do not
Do not look for a Logiks answer key. Forms rotate and the sections are too short to check one against.
Do not agonise over PAPI pairs. Long deliberation produces the inconsistency the format is built to expose.
Do not try to be high on every trait. The ipsative format makes that structurally impossible.
Do not have someone helping on Logiks. Explaining a question aloud costs more time than answering it.
Do not treat a practice percentage as your Logiks score. Reaching more questions matters more than accuracy on the ones you reach.

Frequently asked questions

Can you cheat a Cubiks Logiks test?

No. Logiks sections run only a few minutes each and questions rotate between forms, so there is no time to consult anything and no fixed paper for anyone to leak. A lookup costs more time than the question is worth.

Can you fake the PAPI personality questionnaire?

Not usefully. The ipsative version asks you to choose between two statements that are both flattering, so there is no obviously better option to pick. The questionnaire also returns to the same traits in different wording, which exposes an assembled profile as inconsistent.

What is the difference between PAPI-N and PAPI-I?

PAPI-N is normative: you rate statements on a scale. PAPI-I is ipsative: you pick which of two statements describes you better. The ipsative form is the one that removes the socially desirable answer, because both options are usually desirable.

Is Cubiks the same as Talogy?

Cubiks is now part of Talogy, and you may see either name on your invitation. The Logiks tests, the situational judgement test and the PAPI inventories are the products you are most likely to meet either way.

How do I prepare for a Cubiks assessment?

For Logiks, do short timed runs so the pacing becomes automatic, because the sections are over almost before you settle. For PAPI, answer quickly and honestly rather than deliberating, since deliberation is what produces an incoherent profile.

Practise the Cubiks / Talogy assessment instead

Realistic simulations with scored feedback, so you walk in having already done it once. Free to start.

Start Practising FreeSee the Cubiks / Talogy tests

What to do with the time instead

Practise instead

Cubiks / Talogy practice tests

The Logiks aptitude tests (verbal, numerical, abstract), situational judgement, and PAPI personality inventories. Common at mid-to-large UK employers.

Open

Employer guide

Ministry of Justice assessment guide

What the Ministry of Justice process involves, stage by stage, and where Cubiks / Talogy sits in it.

Open

Same question

Can you cheat SHL?

The supervised re-test is designed to catch an inflated first score. How SHL verification works.

Open

Same question

Can you cheat Saville Assessment?

Short sections, each with its own clock. Why there is no slack in a Saville paper to spend.

Open

Same question

Can you cheat Aon / cut-e?

Two candidates sitting at once barely overlap. Why cut-e answer packs describe nothing.

Open

Browse

Every assessment answered

The same question for every provider we cover, with the mechanism that defeats it.

Open