Skip to main content
All employer guides
Employer guide

Medela Assessment Practice

Two Thomas questionnaires, used to integrate people into teams rather than to rank them. A guide to the HPTI's six traits and to what the report is actually for

PPA + HPTI
Instruments
Behaviour and Personality
78 items
HPTI length
Seven-point scale
8 to 10 min
HPTI duration
Untimed
Integration
Stated purpose
Teams and managers

What Medela uses and what for

Medela is a Swiss medical device manufacturer, best known for breastfeeding and healthcare suction products, operating internationally from its base near Zug. Thomas International publishes a case study naming Medela as a user of the Behaviour assessment, the PPA, and the Personality assessment, which Thomas powers with the High Potential Trait Indicator or HPTI. The described purpose is team and manager integration.

Integration is a development use rather than a screening one, so be careful about what you infer. What is evidenced is that Medela runs these instruments. What is not evidenced is that they gate a job application. If you are applying, ask whether an assessment is part of your process rather than assuming one is.

Why an integration use should relax you, not worry you
A questionnaire used to help a new manager work well with an existing team has no ranking and no rejection attached to it. The output is a conversation about how you and the people around you prefer to operate. The only way to get a bad outcome from that is to submit a profile of someone who is not you, and then have to work as that person.

The HPTI's six traits

Seventy-eight statements, each rated from one, disagree completely, to seven, agree completely. Every item maps to exactly one of six traits, which makes the scoring a straightforward average per trait. Thomas gives eight to ten minutes, does not time it, and supports computers, tablets and phones.

Trait 1
Conscientiousness
Planning, organisation and follow-through. Generally the trait employers most want high, and even here Thomas frames very high scores as carrying a rigidity risk.
Trait 2
Adjustment
Composure under stress and resilience to setbacks. Very high adjustment can read as a person who does not register warning signs.
Trait 3
Curiosity
Interest in new ideas, methods and information. High curiosity in an operational role can mean a person who reinvents settled processes.
Trait 4
Risk Approach
Thomas frames this as courage: willingness to confront difficult situations rather than avoid them. Low is conflict-averse, very high is confrontational.
Trait 5
Ambiguity Acceptance
Comfort with unclear situations. Thomas describes the low end as liking clear-cut answers and simple solutions, which is an asset in a regulated manufacturing context and a liability in a start-up.
Trait 6
Competitiveness
Drive to win and to be seen to win. The clearest example of a trait where more is not better: a candidate who thinks competitiveness should be maxed has misread the instrument.

The optimal range idea, and why it defeats gaming

The HPTI is built around the idea that each trait has an optimal range for a given role rather than a direction of virtue. That is not a softening statement in a marketing brochure; it is how the instrument is scored and reported.

This is why the usual candidate strategy fails here. Answering seven to every flattering statement does not produce a strong profile, it produces a profile sitting outside the optimal band on several traits at once, which reads as either a poor role fit or an inattentive respondent. A medical device manufacturer working under regulatory quality systems is very unlikely to want maximum ambiguity acceptance and maximum risk approach in a production quality manager.

The PPA, in brief

Twenty-four screens, four adjectives each, most like you and least like you. Untimed, under eight minutes, and it produces three DISC graphs rather than a score: work mask, behaviour under pressure, and the difference between them. There is no pass mark and Thomas states you cannot fail it.

Where the HPTI describes traits, the PPA describes behavioural style, and for team integration work the pairing is the point. One says what you tend to be like, the other says how that shows up in a room.

How to answer both well

Use the ends of the scale

Seventy-eight items answered as fours and fives is the most common way to waste an HPTI. If a statement is clearly true of you, say seven. Middling answers produce a profile that cannot distinguish you from anyone.

Answer for the role you are in, at work

Both instruments are about working behaviour. Your weekend self is not the subject.

Do not try to be consistent by memory

Long inventories reuse themes on purpose. Answering each item on its own terms produces better consistency than trying to recall what you said thirty items ago.

Ask for the debrief

In an integration context a debrief is normal and often already planned. It is the single most useful output of the whole exercise for you personally.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the HPTI a test?

No. It is a self-report trait inventory. There are no right answers, no time limit and no pass mark, and Thomas says so on its own candidate page.

What is the difference between HPTI and TEIQue?

HPTI is a 78-item six-trait personality inventory and sits in Thomas's general platform. TEIQue is a 153-item trait emotional intelligence inventory that Thomas says should only be administered by an accredited expert. Both use a seven-point agreement scale, which is why they get confused.

Can I do it on my phone?

Yes for the HPTI and the PPA, both of which Thomas supports on computers, tablets and phones. The Aptitude assessment, the GIA, is the one that requires a desktop.

Does Medela use these to hire?

The Thomas case study describes team and manager integration. Whether an assessment appears in your specific recruitment process is a question for the Medela recruiter, and a normal one to ask.

Practise the format

Our Thomas practice hub includes the HPTI across all six traits and the PPA with its three graphs, plus the GIA in case a timed aptitude stage turns up in your process.

CogniPrep is an independent practice platform. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by or connected to Medela AG, Thomas International or any other employer or assessment provider. Medela, Thomas, PPA and HPTI are trademarks of their respective owners and are used here for identification and descriptive purposes only. All tests on this platform are independent simulations, are not real assessments, and are not supplied, reviewed or endorsed by those organisations. The Thomas use described here is documented as team and manager integration rather than as candidate screening; confirm your own process with the Medela recruitment team.

Try the HPTI format before it matters

Seventy-eight statements across six traits, with a plain-language read of what an optimal range means

Practise Thomas Tests