Skip to main content
Back to Blogs
Preparation8 min read

Asking for Assessment Adjustments: A Practical Guide for Neurodivergent Candidates

How to request reasonable adjustments or accommodations for an online assessment, what employers can realistically offer, when to ask, and what happens to the information you disclose.

1
Ask before you sit it
Adjustments are almost never applied retrospectively. A request made after a poor result is a much harder conversation than the same request made a week earlier.
2
Ask for something specific
"I have dyslexia" invites a vague answer. "Please can I have 25 per cent extra time on the timed sections" can simply be actioned.
3
Ask the recruiter, not the vendor
The employer holds the configuration. Test publishers build the capability; the employer decides whether it is switched on for you.

A timed online assessment is a measuring instrument, and like any instrument it can measure the wrong thing. A speeded verbal task given to a dyslexic candidate without adjustment measures reading speed rather than reasoning. Adjustments exist to stop that happening, and the practical problem is that almost nobody tells candidates how to ask for them.

What an adjustment is for

The point of an adjustment is not to make a test easier. It is to remove a barrier that is unrelated to the thing being assessed, so the result reflects the ability the employer actually cares about. That framing matters, because it is the framing that gets requests granted.

A request phrased as “I would find this hard” is a request for an advantage. A request phrased as “without extra time this test measures my reading speed rather than my reasoning” is a request for a valid measurement, and it is the same request stated in terms the employer can act on.

Terminology by market
The concept is close to universal and the vocabulary is not. In the UK the term is reasonable adjustments, under the Equality Act. In the United States it is reasonable accommodations, under the ADA. In Australia it is reasonable adjustments under the Disability Discrimination Act. In the Netherlands and much of the EU the framing comes through equal treatment legislation and the employer's duty to make effective modifications. Using your market's term gets you to the right person faster.

What is realistically available

Assessment platforms are more configurable than most candidates assume. These are the adjustments that are commonly implementable rather than the ones that sound reasonable in theory.

Most common
Extra time
Usually offered as a percentage uplift, commonly 25 per cent. Available on most timed platforms as a per-candidate setting. The most useful adjustment on reasoning tests and the least useful on tests specifically designed to measure processing speed, where it changes what is being measured.
Frequently possible
Untimed or generously timed delivery
Some platforms can turn the clock off entirely. Worth asking about where the construct is knowledge or judgement rather than speed. Note that some vendors record response time even without a visible countdown, so ask what "untimed" means.
Frequently possible
Breaks between sections
A rest between sections rather than one continuous sitting. Particularly relevant for ADHD, chronic fatigue and conditions affecting sustained concentration, and often easier to grant than extra time.
Sometimes possible
Screen reader or assistive technology compatibility
Varies sharply by platform and by section type. Ask early, because if the answer is no, an alternative assessment route has to be found rather than configured.
Sometimes possible
Alternative format or alternative stage
Where a test cannot be made accessible, some employers substitute a different evidence source: a structured interview, a work sample, or a task-based exercise. This is the adjustment that most often needs a human conversation rather than a form.
Often overlooked
Language version
Not framed as a disability adjustment, but the same principle. Many publishers offer their tests in dozens of languages, and speeded verbal tasks are heavily penalising in a second language. Ask which versions exist.

When to ask, in order

Timing is where most requests go wrong. The sequence that works:

  1. At application, if there is a box. Many application forms include a question about adjustments. Answering it creates a record and routes you to the right team automatically.
  2. On receiving the invitation, at the latest. Reply to the invitation email before you open the assessment link. Once you have started a test, changing its configuration is frequently impossible.
  3. Immediately if something goes wrong mid-test. A crash, a timer that behaves oddly, a section that will not render with your assistive software. Report it the same day, in writing, with times.
  4. Not after the result. Occasionally an employer will offer a re-sit if a genuine access failure occurred, but you are asking someone to reverse a decision rather than to configure a test.

What you do and do not have to disclose

You are generally not required to explain your diagnosis in detail to get a practical adjustment, and many employers deliberately route these requests away from hiring managers so the decision-maker never sees them. What an employer typically needs is the functional impact and the specific adjustment, not the medical history.

In practice, a request of the form “I have a condition that affects reading speed; please can I have 25 per cent extra time on the timed sections” is usually enough. Some employers ask for evidence such as a diagnostic report or an educational access arrangement letter, and asking what evidence they need is a reasonable first reply.

Where the information goes afterwards is a fair question to ask, and it connects to a wider set of rights covered in what happens to your assessment data.

How to phrase the request

Do
Name the adjustment you want, with a number where one applies: "25 per cent extra time on the timed sections".
Say which stage it applies to. Extra time on a reasoning test and a break between sections of a video interview are different asks.
Ask what evidence, if any, they need, rather than pre-emptively attaching a medical history.
Send it in writing, so there is a record with a date on it.
Ask whether the adjustment will be visible to the people assessing you, if that matters to you.
Do not
Do not open the assessment link before the answer comes back. Starting the test usually locks the configuration.
Do not apologise for asking or frame it as a favour. It is a standard part of a professional recruitment process.
Do not describe your diagnosis in detail unless you have been asked to. It is rarely what makes a request actionable.
Do not assume "untimed" means untimed. Some platforms record response time invisibly, so ask what is measured.
Do not accept silence. If nobody replies within a couple of days, chase, and ask for the deadline to be extended while it is resolved.

Which formats cause the most trouble, and why

Speeded batteries

Tests built entirely around rate, such as the Thomas Aptitude assessment's five short tasks or checking sections generally, are the hardest case. Extra time on a pure speed test alters what is being measured, so employers sometimes prefer to substitute a different assessment rather than adjust this one. That is a legitimate outcome and worth proposing yourself if the alternative is a meaningless score.

Tests with hidden source material

Formats that hide the data behind tabs, or that remove a statement before you answer, place a heavy load on working memory that has nothing to do with the reasoning being assessed. Worth naming explicitly if working memory is the affected function.

Video interviews

Short preparation windows and a single recording attempt are the barrier here. Common adjustments are longer thinking time, more takes, or a live interview instead. Our video interview practice is worth using to work out which of those you actually need.

Game-based assessments

These frequently depend on reaction time, motor precision or rapid visual processing. Vendors vary enormously in what they can adjust, and the honest answer is sometimes that the instrument cannot be made accessible, in which case an alternative stage is the right ask.

A note on the anxiety side of this

Many candidates who would benefit from an adjustment never ask, because they believe it marks their application. That fear is understandable and, in most large recruitment processes, misplaced: adjustment requests are usually handled by a separate team and reach the assessor as a configuration rather than as a note about you.

The alternative is sitting an instrument that measures the wrong thing and then competing against a percentile derived from it. If the anxiety itself is the main barrier rather than the format, the guide to test anxiety on timed assessments covers the parts of that you can work on directly.

This article describes common practice rather than the law in your jurisdiction. If you need to know your specific entitlements, an employment adviser, a disability employment service or your university careers service will give you a definitive answer for your market.

Practise in the conditions you will actually get

Once an adjustment is agreed, rehearse with it. Extra time changes your pacing, and pacing is something you want settled before the real sitting.

Start Practising Free